Amazon Mechanical Turk: The Digital Sweatshop by Ellen
Cushing
Utne Reader, Jan-Feb 2013
The Turk
or Mechanical Turk or Automatron[1]
Chess Player was a hoax of the late 1700s. The Turk was in fact a mechanical
illusion that allowed a human chess master hiding inside to operate the
machine.
“The funny thing about the biggest shift in production in
years is that almost nobody knows it happened. Which makes sense, if you think
about it: It occurred invisibly, online, anonymously, all over the world, but
at the same time, nowhere in particular. And it’s poised—if most people who
know about it are to be believed—to completely change the way we think about
work, the way we consume technology, and the way the global economy functions.
It’s called microtasking[2],
and it works by outsourcing small, virtual tasks to an army of online workers,
who then perform them for pennies. These tasks vary widely in scope and
substance, but what links them all is that they’re essentially too difficult or
too dependent on human analysis for a computer to do, but too simple for
skilled labor. And they’re the bedrock of the internet.
Crowdsourced[3]
microtasking—conducted largely via Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk site—is now a
multimillion-dollar industry, and one that doesn’t appear to be slowing down
anytime soon. Even as the global economy continues to falter, Turk is thriving,
due in no small part to what it can do for companies under pressure to do more
with less.
“There’s this sort of competitive insanity of the business
environment,” said Six Silberman, a longtime observer of the field who helped
create a forum, Turkopticon,
for people doing this kind of work. “And everyone’s trying to cut costs as
strenuously and as rapidly as possible.” In a globalized economy, that’s easy
to do: Mechanical Turkers—even those who live in the U.S.—make somewhere around
$1.50 an hour on average, enjoy no worker protections, and have no benefits.”
Read more at Utne
Reader.
Bezos describes the
work as “artificial artificial intelligence”. Hence the nod to the Mechanical
Turk.
It’s not only being used to add a few bucks to people’s
income, it’s being used to replace a lost job.
Laws don’t exist to cover this type of work.
The output of a Turker can be rejected for any reason and
the Turker gets no feedback, just the rejection.
This is another commercialization of the trend begun by open
source projects[4] in
the world of programming.
It’s touted as a revolution as important as the industrial
revolution and the future for the Internet.
In my opinion, it’s a trend headed in exactly the wrong
direction. It’s the industrial revolution on steroids – hierarchy,
segmentalism, exploitation, fragmentation, purposelessness, siloing, soullessness
and all the other ills we should be trying to get away from. It like the
Mechanical Turk is a fraud, a cruel hoax, perpetrated on the people.
[2] “Microtasking
is the act of breaking a large project into tiny, well defined tasks. The
resultant microtasks are proposed to a crowd and are characterized because: it
can be performed independently, it requires human participation or intelligence
(so it cannot be performed automatically by a computer) and because it can be
done in a short period of time. Some experts, like Sharon Chiarella, vice
president of Amazon Mechanical Turk, indicates that this “short period” should
be less than an hour.” Crowd
Sourcing Blog
[3] “Crowdsourcing
is a process that involves outsourcing tasks to a distributed group of people.
This process can occur both online and offline. Crowdsourcing is different from
an ordinary outsourcing since it is a task or problem that is outsourced to an
undefined public rather than a specific body. Crowdsourcing is related to, but
not the same as, human-based computation, which refers to the ways in which
humans and computers can work together to solve problems. These two methods can
be used together to accomplish tasks.” Wikipedia
[4] “In
production and development, open source is a philosophy, or pragmatic
methodology that promotes free redistribution and access to an end product's
design and implementation details. Before the phrase open source became widely
adopted, developers and producers used a variety of terms for the concept; open
source gained hold with the rise of the Internet, and the attendant need for
massive retooling of the computing source code. Opening the source code enabled
a self-enhancing diversity of production models, communication paths, and
interactive communities. The open-source software movement arose to clarify the
environment that the new copyright, licensing, domain, and consumer issues
created.” Wikipedia
No comments:
Post a Comment